Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut

Taft v. Wheelabrator Putnam, Inc.

252 Conn. 918

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jurisdiction
Connecticut
Date
2000-01-19
Topic
general

The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 55 Conn. App. 359 (AC 18064), is granted, limited to the following issue: *919The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16241. Sheila A. Huddleston, Joseph P. Williams and John E.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Taft v. Wheelabrator Putnam, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions

The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 55 Conn. App. 359 (AC 18064), is granted, limited to the following issue:

*919 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16241. Sheila A. Huddleston, Joseph P. Williams and John E. Wertam, in support of the petition. Ernest J. Cotnoir, in opposition. Decided January 19, 2000
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the legislature’s validating act could not cure a zoning commission’s late publication of notice of its decision on a zoning application?”

SULLIVAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.