Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut
Schreck v. City of Stamford
247 Conn. 955
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Connecticut
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 1999-01-04
- Topic
- employee-benefits-and-executive-compensation
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 51 Conn. App. 92 (AC 17668), is granted, limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that, under General Statutes § 31-301 (a), the time for a party to appeal to the compensation review board from a decision of a workers’ compensation commissioner does not begin until the commissioner sends notice of the decision to the party, rather than to the party’s counsel?” *956The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16061. Richard S. Bartlett, in support of the petition. Joseph Lucian Gerardi, in opposition.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Schreck v. City of Stamford. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 51 Conn. App. 92 (AC 17668), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that, under General Statutes § 31-301 (a), the time for a party to appeal to the compensation review board from a decision of a workers’ compensation commissioner does not begin until the commissioner sends notice of the decision to the party, rather than to the party’s counsel?”
NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.