Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions

MERCER v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION, 247 Conn. 920 (1998)

EUGENE MERCER v. Comm’r OF CORRECTION, 722 A.2d 810 (Conn. 1998)

Type: Opinion
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Date: 1998-10-08
Topic: general

MERCER v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION, 247 Conn. 920 (1998) 722 A.2d 810 EUGENE MERCER v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTIONSupreme Court of Connecticut The petitioner Eugene Mercer's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court,49 Conn. App. 819 (AC 17663), is denied. CALLAHAN, C.J., and NORCOTT and KATZ, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed MERCER v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION, 247 Conn. 920 (1998). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

MERCER v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION,247 Conn. 920(1998)

722 A.2d 810

EUGENE MERCERv.COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

Supreme Court of Connecticut

The petitioner Eugene Mercer's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court,49 Conn. App. 819(AC 17663), is denied.Page 921

CALLAHAN, C.J., and NORCOTT and KATZ, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

J.L. Pottenger, Jr., in support of the petition.Jo Anne Sulik, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

Decided October 8, 1998