Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions

STATE v. BOND, 247 Conn. 915 (1998)

722 A.2d 808

Type: Opinion
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Date: 1998-09-29
Topic: general

STATE v. BOND, 247 Conn. 915 (1998) 722 A.2d 808 STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. DANTE BONDSupreme Court of Connecticut The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 49 Conn. App. 183 (AC 16306), is denied. BERDON, J., dissenting.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE v. BOND, 247 Conn. 915 (1998). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

STATE v. BOND,247 Conn. 915(1998)

722 A.2d 808

STATE OF CONNECTICUTv.DANTE BOND

Supreme Court of Connecticut

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court,49 Conn. App. 183(AC 16306), is denied.

BERDON, J., dissenting.

I would grant the defendant's petition for certification to appeal on the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court's comment about the existence of a criminal conspiracy, made during its jury instruction on accomplice testimony, only implicated general principles of credibility and, therefore, did not merit review under State v. Golding,213 Conn. 233,567 A.2d 823(1989)?

"2. If review is warranted, did the trial court's comment deprive the defendant of a fair trial?"

Glenn W. Falk, special public defender, in support of the petition.Linda N. Howe, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

Decided September 29, 1998