Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
TOWN OF WINDHAM v. FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COMMISSION, 245 Conn. 913 (1998)
TOWN OF WINDHAM v. FREEDOM OF Info. Comm’n, 718 A.2d 18 (Conn. 1998)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 1998-06-17
- Topic
- general
TOWN OF WINDHAM v. FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COMMISSION, 245 Conn. 913 (1998) 718 A.2d 18 TOWN OF WINDHAM v. FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COMMISSION ET AL.Supreme Court of Connecticut The named defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 529 (AC 17065), is granted, limited to the following issue: "Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the gathering of four members of the Windham board of selectmen to discuss an upcoming meeting of that board was not a `meeting' for purposes of General Statutes § 1-21 because the four members did not constitute a quorum under General Statutes § 1-18a (b)?" KATZ, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition. The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15961.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed TOWN OF WINDHAM v. FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COMMISSION, 245 Conn. 913 (1998). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
"Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the gathering of four members of the Windham board ofPage 914selectmen to discuss an upcoming meeting of that board was not a `meeting' for purposes of General Statutes §1-21because the four members did not constitute a quorum under General Statutes §1-18a(b)?"
KATZ, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15961.Victor R. Perpetua, in support of the petition.Richard S. Cody, in opposition.