Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut
State v. Preston
243 Conn. 946
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Connecticut
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 1997-11-06
- Topic
- general
The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 46 Conn. App. 778 (AC 15834), is granted, limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that, under the evidence in this case, the third and fourth prongs of State v. Whistnant, 179 Conn. 576, 588 (1980), were satisfied, in that the trial court was required to give a charge on the lesser included offense of larceny in the sixth degree?” KATZ, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Preston. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 46 Conn. App. 778 (AC 15834), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that, under the evidence in this case, the third and fourth prongs of State v. Whistnant, 179 Conn. 576, 588 (1980), were satisfied, in that the trial court was required to give a charge on the lesser included offense of larceny in the sixth degree?”
KATZ, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.