Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions

PEQUOT SPRING WATER COMPANY v. BRUNELLE, 243 Conn. 928 (1997)

PEQUOT SPRING WATER Co. v. DORIS G. BRUNELLE, 701 A.2d 658 (Conn. 1997)

Type: Opinion
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Date: 1997-09-30
Topic: general

PEQUOT SPRING WATER COMPANY v. BRUNELLE, 243 Conn. 928 (1997) 701 A.2d 658 PEQUOT SPRING WATER COMPANY v. DORIS G. BRUNELLE ET AL.Supreme Court of Connecticut The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 46 Conn. App. 187 (AC 15993), is granted, limited to the following issue: "Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the lease between the parties contained an implied covenant by the lessee to remain in business?" The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15782.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PEQUOT SPRING WATER COMPANY v. BRUNELLE, 243 Conn. 928 (1997). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PEQUOT SPRING WATER COMPANY v. BRUNELLE,243 Conn. 928(1997)

701 A.2d 658

PEQUOT SPRING WATER COMPANYv.DORIS G. BRUNELLE ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court,46 Conn. App. 187(AC 15993), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the lease between the parties contained an implied covenant by the lessee to remain in business?"

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15782.Francis J. BradyandEverett E. Newton, in support of the petition.James G. Green, Jr., in opposition.

Decided September 30, 1997