Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut
State v. Garvin
State v. Garvin, 239 Conn. 950 (Conn. 1996)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Connecticut
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 1996-12-04
- Topic
- general
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 43 Conn. App. 142 (AC 15092), is granted, limited to the following issues: “1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the defendant’s conviction for two counts of failure to appear arising from a single act did not violate the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy? “2. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the defendant’s due process rights were not violated by the enforcement of an illusory plea agreement with the sentencing court?” *951Decided December 4, 1996 Donald D. Dakers, special public defender, in support of the petition.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Garvin. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 43 Conn. App. 142 (AC 15092), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the defendant’s conviction for two counts of failure to appear arising from a single act did not violate the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy?
“2. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the defendant’s due process rights were not violated by the enforcement of an illusory plea agreement with the sentencing court?”