Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut
State v. Coleman
237 Conn. 931
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Connecticut
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 1996-07-01
- Topic
- general
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 41 Conn. App. 255 (AC 12812), is granted, limited to the following isssues: “1. Did the Appellate Court improperly disregard the state’s concession that, in this case, the defendant should not receive multiple punishment for his two burglary convictions? “2. Whether, under our supervisory powers or the state constitution, we should adopt the presumption *932set forth in North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711 (1969), pertaining to the imposition of a greater sentence after having successfully attacked his first conviction?” The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15468.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Coleman. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 41 Conn. App. 255 (AC 12812), is granted, limited to the following isssues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court improperly disregard the state’s concession that, in this case, the defendant should not receive multiple punishment for his two burglary convictions?
“2. Whether, under our supervisory powers or the state constitution, we should adopt the presumptionThe Supreme Court docket number is SC 15468. Temmy Ann Pieszak, assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Harry Weller, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided July 1, 1996*932 set forth in North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711 (1969), pertaining to the imposition of a greater sentence after having successfully attacked his first conviction?”