Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions

CHAPMAN v. NORFOLK AND DEDHAM MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE, 235 Conn. 925 (1995)

DONALD CHAPMAN v. NORFOLK & DEDHAM Mut. FIRE INSURANCECOMPANY, 666 A.2d 1185 (Conn. 1995)

Type
Opinion
Court
Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
Jurisdiction
Connecticut
Date
1995-01-01
Topic
general

CHAPMAN v. NORFOLK AND DEDHAM MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE, 235 Conn. 925 (1995) 666 A.2d 1185 DONALD CHAPMAN ET AL. v. NORFOLK AND DEDHAM MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCECOMPANY ET AL.Supreme Court of Connecticut The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 39 Conn. App. 306 (AC 12718), is denied. Jon D.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed CHAPMAN v. NORFOLK AND DEDHAM MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE, 235 Conn. 925 (1995). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

CHAPMAN v. NORFOLK AND DEDHAM MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE,235 Conn. 925(1995)
666 A.2d 1185
DONALD CHAPMAN ET AL.v.NORFOLK AND DEDHAM MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE
COMPANY ET AL.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court,39 Conn. App. 306(AC 12718), is denied.Jon D. BillerandDavid B. Rozwaski, in support of the petition.Stephen E. GoldmanandPatricia J. Campanella, in opposition.
Decided October 27, 1995
Page 926