Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
LYNCH v. GRANBY HOLDINGS, INC., 234 Conn. 919 (1995)
JOSEPH L. LYNCH v. GRANBY HOLDINGS, INC., ET AL.[fn*]GRANBY HOLDINGS, INC., ET AL. v. DANIEL L. LYNCH, 661 A.2d 98 (Conn. 1995)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 1995-07-17
- Topic
- general
LYNCH v. GRANBY HOLDINGS, INC., 234 Conn. 919 (1995) 661 A.2d 98 JOSEPH L. LYNCH ET AL. v. GRANBY HOLDINGS, INC., ET AL.[fn*]GRANBY HOLDINGS, INC., ET AL. v. DANIEL L.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed LYNCH v. GRANBY HOLDINGS, INC., 234 Conn. 919 (1995). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
LYNCH v. GRANBY HOLDINGS, INC.,234 Conn. 919(1995)
661 A.2d 98
JOSEPH L. LYNCH ET AL.v.GRANBY HOLDINGS, INC., ET AL.fn*
GRANBY HOLDINGS, INC., ET AL.v.DANIEL L. LYNCH
Supreme Court of Connecticut
The petition of Granby Holdings, Inc., for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court,37 Conn. App. 846(AC 11222), is granted, limited to the following issues:
"1. Under the circumstances of this case, was the question of the burden of proof on the issue of mitigation of damages properly raised by the plaintiff Daniel Lynch in the trial court?
"2. Should this court reconsider the holding ofPietrorazio v. Santopietro,185 Conn. 510(1981), that the failure to raise a claim in a motion to set aside a verdict limits this court to plain error review of that claim?
"3. Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court employ the plain error doctrine to review on appeal the plaintiff's claim regarding the issue of the burden of proof on mitigation of damages?
"4. If the answer to 3. is yes, did the Appellate Court act properly in doing so?"
The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15298.Andrea Hewitt, in support of the petition.Timothy Brignole, in opposition.
Decided July 17, 1995
- Superseded. See235 Conn. 941(1995). ↩