Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut
State v. Brye
State v. Brye, 234 Conn. 916 (Conn. 1995)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Connecticut
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 1995-07-10
- Topic
- litigation
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 37 Conn. App. 914 (AC 13254), is granted, limited to the following issue: “Was the Appellate Court correct in holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in failing to order *917a new trial when during jury deliberations several jurors made allegedly improper remarks about the defendant who is African-American?” The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15296. Decided July 10, 1995 Richard M. Maraño, special public defender, in support of the petition. Leah Hawley, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Brye. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 37 Conn. App. 914 (AC 13254), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Was the Appellate Court correct in holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in failing to orderThe Supreme Court docket number is SC 15296. Decided July 10, 1995 Richard M. Maraño, special public defender, in support of the petition. Leah Hawley, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.*917 a new trial when during jury deliberations several jurors made allegedly improper remarks about the defendant who is African-American?”