Opinion · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Commonwealth v. Schaeffer
Commonwealth v. Schaeffer, 652 A.2d 294 (Pa. 1994)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- Jurisdiction
- Pennsylvania
- Date
- 1994-12-30
- Topic
- general
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant, v. Paul R. SCHAEFFER, Jr., Appellee. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued Jan. 25, 1994.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Commonwealth v. Schaeffer. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
- Cited by
- 28 opinions
- Distinguished
- 1 times
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant, v. Paul R. SCHAEFFER, Jr., Appellee.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued Jan. 25, 1994.
Decided Dec. 30, 1994.
Paul M. Yatron, Robert A. Graci, Harrisburg, for Atty. General’s Office.
Brett O. Feese, Williamsport, Marianne E. Cox, Philadelphia, Robert E. Colville, Robert L. Eberhardt, Pittsburgh, for Com.
Gaele McLaughlin Barthold, Philadelphia, for amicus curiae, Philadelphia Dist. Attorney’s Office.
David M. McGlaughlin, Philadelphia, for amicus curiae, Pa. Ass’n. of Crim. Defense Lawyers.
Dennis C. MeAndrews, Media, for amicus curiae, Pa. Dist. Attorney’s Ass’n.
Peter T. Campana, Marc F. Loveechio, Williamsport, for P.R. Schaeffer.
Before NIX, C.J., and FLAHERTY, ZAPPALA, PAPADAKOS, CAPPY, CASTILLE and MONTEMURO, JJ.
*295 ORDER
The Court being equally divided, the order of the Superior Court is affirmed.
MONTEMURO, J., did not participate in the decision of these eases.
NIX, C.J., and PAPADAKOS and CASTILLE, JJ., dissent and would reverse the Order of the Superior Court.