Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut
Squeglia v. Squeglia
231 Conn. 920
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Connecticut
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 1994-09-20
- Topic
- commercial
The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 34 Conn. App. 866 (AC 12706), is granted, limited to the following issue: “Was the Appellate Court correct in holding that the doctrine of parental immunity shielded the parent from liability to the minor child for damages under General Statutes § 22-357, the dog bite statute?”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Squeglia v. Squeglia. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 34 Conn. App. 866 (AC 12706), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Was the Appellate Court correct in holding that the doctrine of parental immunity shielded the parent from liability to the minor child for damages under General Statutes § 22-357, the dog bite statute?”