Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
STATE v. ARENA, 229 Conn. 918 (1994)
STATE OF Conn. v. ANTHONY ARENA, 644 A.2d 914 (Conn. 1994)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 1994-05-25
- Topic
- general
STATE v. ARENA, 229 Conn. 918 (1994) 644 A.2d 914 STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. ANTHONY ARENA (14933)Supreme Court of Connecticut The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 33 Conn. App. 468 (AC 11564), is granted, limited to the following issues: "1. Did the Appellate Court properly hold that the defendant's request to charge on a lesser included offense of robbery in the second degree was inadequate because an appropriate instructional request had not been made in that the defendant had cited to only three specific authorities, all revolving around the requirements of State v.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE v. ARENA, 229 Conn. 918 (1994). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
"1. Did the Appellate Court properly hold that the defendant's request to charge on a lesser included offense of robbery in the second degree was inadequate because an appropriate instructional request had not been made in that the defendant had cited to only three specific authorities, all revolving around the requirements of State v. Whistnant,179 Conn. 576(1980), in the text of his request to charge?
"2. Did the Appellate Court properly uphold the trial court's refusal to give an instruction on robbery in the second degree to the jury?"
Marjorie Allen Dauster, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.