Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions

DIME SAVINGS BANK OF WALLINGFORD v. CORNAGLIA, 229 Conn. 907 (1994)

DIME Sav. BANK OF WALLINGFORD v. CARL CORNAGLIA ET AL.[fn*], 640 A.2d 120 (Conn. 1994)

Type
Opinion
Court
Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
Jurisdiction
Connecticut
Date
1994-01-01
Topic
general

DIME SAVINGS BANK OF WALLINGFORD v. CORNAGLIA, 229 Conn. 907 (1994) 640 A.2d 120 DIME SAVINGS BANK OF WALLINGFORD v. CARL CORNAGLIA ET AL.[fn*] (14915)Supreme Court of Connecticut [fn*] The defendant's appeal was withdrawn October 17, 1994. The defendant Rose Marie Cornaglia's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court,33 Conn. App. 549 (AC 12098), is granted, limited to the following issue: "Assuming that a finding by the trial court was necessary to enable appellate review of the trial court's decision, should the Appellate Court have remanded to the trial court for articulation of the reasons for its decision?" Donald C.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed DIME SAVINGS BANK OF WALLINGFORD v. CORNAGLIA, 229 Conn. 907 (1994). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

DIME SAVINGS BANK OF WALLINGFORD v. CORNAGLIA,229 Conn. 907(1994)
640 A.2d 120
DIME SAVINGS BANK OF WALLINGFORDv.CARL CORNAGLIA ET AL.fn*
(14915)
Supreme Court of Connecticut
The defendant Rose Marie Cornaglia's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court,33 Conn. App. 549(AC 12098), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Assuming that a finding by the trial court was necessary to enable appellate review of the trial court's decision, should the Appellate Court have remanded to the trial court for articulation of the reasons for its decision?"
Donald C. Lunt, in support of the petition.Bruce A. Fontanella, in opposition.
Decided March 25, 1994
Page 908
  1. The defendant's appeal was withdrawn October 17, 1994. ↩