Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut
Wynn v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance
Wynn v. Metro. Prop. & Cas. Ins., 226 Conn. 907 (Conn. 1993)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Connecticut
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 1993-06-04
- Topic
- general
The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 30 Conn. App. 803 (AC 11170), is granted, limited to the following issues: “1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the statute of limitations defense was a threshold issue which the trial court could decide without referring the same to the arbitrators in light of the positive assurance test for arbitrability and General Statutes § 52-410? “2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the statute of limitations had run prior to the filing of the plaintiff’s application to compel arbitration?”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Wynn v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 3 opinions
The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 30 Conn. App. 803 (AC 11170), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the statute of limitations defense was a threshold issue which the trial court could decide without referring the same to the arbitrators in light of the positive assurance test for arbitrability and General Statutes § 52-410?
“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the statute of limitations had run prior to the filing of the plaintiff’s application to compel arbitration?”