Opinion · Njlaw New Jersey

NAUMAN v. CENTRAL LAFAYETTE REALTY COMPANY, INC., 1 N.J. 124 (1948)

WILBUR NAUMAN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. Cent. LAFAYETTE REALTY COMPANY,INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT., 62 A.2d 218 (N.J. 1948)

Type: Opinion
Court: Njlaw New Jersey
Jurisdiction: Njlaw
Date: 1948-11-29
Topic: general

NAUMAN v. CENTRAL LAFAYETTE REALTY COMPANY, INC., 1 N.J. 124 (1948) 62 A.2d 218 WILBUR NAUMAN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CENTRAL LAFAYETTE REALTY COMPANY,INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.Supreme Court of New Jersey.Argued November 22, 1948 — Decided November 29, 1948. Mr. Harry Green argued the cause for the plaintiff-appellant (Messrs.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed NAUMAN v. CENTRAL LAFAYETTE REALTY COMPANY, INC., 1 N.J. 124 (1948). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

NAUMAN v. CENTRAL LAFAYETTE REALTY COMPANY, INC.,1 N.J. 124(1948)

62 A.2d 218

WILBUR NAUMAN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CENTRAL LAFAYETTE REALTY COMPANY,

INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued November 22, 1948 —

Decided November 29, 1948.

Mr. Harry Greenargued the cause for the plaintiff-appellant (Messrs. Mintz Herships, attorneys).Mr. George F. Lahey, Jr., argued the cause for the defendant-respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment will be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Mr. Justice Burling in the court below.For affirmance:Chief Justice VANDERBILT and Justices OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD and ACKERSON — 4.For reversal:Justice HEHER — 1.