Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut

Arway v. Bloom

Arway v. Bloom, 224 Conn. 924 (Conn. 1993)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jurisdiction
Connecticut
Date
1993-01-06
Topic
general

The plaintiffs Christine Arway, Arthur Arway, Dan Smith, Kerin McCormick and Christine McCormick’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 29 Conn. App. 469 (AC 11057), is granted, limited to the following issue: “Whether General Statutes §§ 8-3 (g) and 8-3c (b) require the decision of a zoning commission to be set *925aside when a decision of the wetlands commission affecting the same property is judicially determined to have been illegal?” The Supreme Court docket number is SC 14673. Jan A. Marcus, in support of the petition. Decided January 6, 1993

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Arway v. Bloom. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion

The plaintiffs Christine Arway, Arthur Arway, Dan Smith, Kerin McCormick and Christine McCormick’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 29 Conn. App. 469 (AC 11057), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Whether General Statutes §§ 8-3 (g) and 8-3c (b) require the decision of a zoning commission to be set *925 aside when a decision of the wetlands commission affecting the same property is judicially determined to have been illegal?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 14673. Jan A. Marcus, in support of the petition. Decided January 6, 1993