Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions

STATE v. KARI, 221 Conn. 910 (1992)

STATE OF Conn. v. NELSON KARI, 602 A.2d 9 (Conn. 1992)

Type
Opinion
Court
Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
Jurisdiction
Connecticut
Date
1992-01-01
Topic
general

STATE v. KARI, 221 Conn. 910 (1992) 602 A.2d 9 STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. NELSON KARISupreme Court of Connecticut The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 26 Conn. App. 286, is granted, limited to the following issue: "Was there sufficient evidence in the record to support a reasonable finding that the defendant acted `corruptly' within the meaning of Connecticut General Statutes 53-153?" John R. Williams, in support of the petition.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE v. KARI, 221 Conn. 910 (1992). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

STATE v. KARI,221 Conn. 910(1992)
602 A.2d 9
STATE OF CONNECTICUTv.NELSON KARI
Supreme Court of Connecticut
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court,26 Conn. App. 286, is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Was there sufficient evidence in the record to support a reasonable finding that the defendant acted `corruptly' within the meaning of Connecticut General Statutes53-153?"

John R. Williams, in support of the petition.

Leon F. Dalbec, Jr., assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
Decided January 23, 1992
Page 911