Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
STATE v. GEISLER, 220 Conn. 918 (1991)
STATE OF Conn. v. MARTIN GEISLER, 597 A.2d 343 (Conn. 1991)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 1991-01-01
- Topic
- general
STATE v. GEISLER, 220 Conn. 918 (1991) 597 A.2d 343 STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. MARTIN GEISLERSupreme Court of Connecticut The state of Connecticut's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 25 Conn. App. 282, is granted, limited to the following issue: "Was the Appellate Court correct in reversing the trial court's factual finding that the police reasonably believed that the defendant was in need of emergency assistance, thus rendering entry of the defendant's home lawful under the emergency doctrine?" Leon F. Dalbec, Jr., assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE v. GEISLER, 220 Conn. 918 (1991). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
"Was the Appellate Court correct in reversing the trial court's factual finding that the police reasonably believed that the defendant was in need of emergency assistance, thus rendering entry of the defendant's home lawful under the emergency doctrine?"
Leon F. Dalbec, Jr., assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition.
Richard Emanuel, assistant public defender, in opposition.