Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut

Gil v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency of Greenwich

216 Conn. 829

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jurisdiction
Connecticut
Date
1990-11-02
Topic
general

The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 23 Conn. App. 379, is granted, limited to the following issue: “In considering whether the action of an inland wetlands agency denying a building permit amounts to an unconstitutional taking of the applicant’s property, what is the proper standard for determining a taking?”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Gil v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency of Greenwich. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion

The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 23 Conn. App. 379, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“In considering whether the action of an inland wetlands agency denying a building permit amounts to an unconstitutional taking of the applicant’s property, what is the proper standard for determining a taking?”