Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions

SCHAGHTICOKE INDIANS OF KENT v. POTTER, 215 Conn. 816 (1990)

SCHAGHTICOKE INDIANS OF KENT, Conn., INC. v. KEITHPOTTER, 576 A.2d 546 (Conn. 1990)

Type: Opinion
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Date: 1990-06-21
Topic: general

SCHAGHTICOKE INDIANS OF KENT v. POTTER, 215 Conn. 816 (1990) 576 A.2d 546 SCHAGHTICOKE INDIANS OF KENT, CONNECTICUT, INC., ET AL. v. KEITHPOTTER ET AL.Supreme Court of Connecticut The plaintiffs state of Connecticut's and commissioner of environmental protection's for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court,22 Conn. App. 229, is granted, limited to the following issues: "1. Do the Connecticut courts have civil jurisdiction over the state's Indian tribes and reservations?" "2.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed SCHAGHTICOKE INDIANS OF KENT v. POTTER, 215 Conn. 816 (1990). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

SCHAGHTICOKE INDIANS OF KENT v. POTTER,215 Conn. 816(1990)

576 A.2d 546

SCHAGHTICOKE INDIANS OF KENT, CONNECTICUT, INC., ET AL.v.KEITH

POTTER ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

The plaintiffs state of Connecticut's and commissioner of environmental protection's forPage 817certification for appeal from the Appellate Court,22 Conn. App. 229, is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Do the Connecticut courts have civil jurisdiction over the state's Indian tribes and reservations?"

"2. Does the state, as intervenor, have the right to appeal an Indian tribal dispute?"

Grace M. Dodier, assistant attorney general, in support of the petition.

Decided June 21, 1990