Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut
Waterman v. United Caribbean, Inc.
213 Conn. 813
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Connecticut
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 1990-01-11
- Topic
- general
The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 20 Conn. App. 283, is granted, limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court err in concluding that a trial court may properly render judgment beyond the 120 *814day period allowed by Connecticut General Statutes § 51-183b without the waiver or consent of all parties prior to rendition of the judgment?” Haden P. Gerrish, in support of the petition. Paul L. Bollo, in opposition.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Waterman v. United Caribbean, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 20 Conn. App. 283, is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court err in concluding that a trial court may properly render judgment beyond the 120Haden P. Gerrish, in support of the petition. Paul L. Bollo, in opposition. Decided January 11, 1990*814 day period allowed by Connecticut General Statutes § 51-183b without the waiver or consent of all parties prior to rendition of the judgment?”