Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions

DANZIGER v. DEMOLITION BOARD OF STAMFORD, 211 Conn. 805 (1989)

559 A.2d 1139

Type: Opinion
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Date: 1989-05-05
Topic: general

DANZIGER v. DEMOLITION BOARD OF STAMFORD, 211 Conn. 805 (1989) 559 A.2d 1139 FELIX DANZIGER ET AL. v. DEMOLITION BOARD OF THE CITY OF STAMFORDSupreme Court of Connecticut The plaintiffs' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 18 Conn. App. 40, is denied. L.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed DANZIGER v. DEMOLITION BOARD OF STAMFORD, 211 Conn. 805 (1989). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

DANZIGER v. DEMOLITION BOARD OF STAMFORD,211 Conn. 805(1989)

559 A.2d 1139

FELIX DANZIGER ET AL.v.DEMOLITION BOARD OF THE CITY OF STAMFORD

Supreme Court of Connecticut

The plaintiffs' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court,18 Conn. App. 40, is denied.

L. Morris Glucksman, in support of the petition.

Barry J. Boodman, assistant corporation counsel, in opposition.

Decided May 5, 1989