Opinion · Palaw Pennsylvania

KOTCHIN v. SIMPKINS, 520 Pa. 78 (1988)

550 A.2d 1319

Type
Opinion
Court
Palaw Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction
Palaw
Date
1988-12-15
Topic
general

KOTCHIN v. SIMPKINS, 520 Pa. 78 (1988) 550 A.2d 1319 Regina A. KOTCHIN, Administratrix of the Estate of Charlotte Plummer,Deceased, Appellant, v. Donald T. SIMPKINS, Individually, and S BRestaurant, Inc., A Pennsylvania Corporation, Operating as Woodlands, AnInn.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.Argued: December 8, 1988.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed KOTCHIN v. SIMPKINS, 520 Pa. 78 (1988). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

KOTCHIN v. SIMPKINS,520 Pa. 78(1988)
550 A.2d 1319
Regina A. KOTCHIN, Administratrix of the Estate of Charlotte Plummer,
Deceased, Appellant, v. Donald T. SIMPKINS, Individually, and S B
Restaurant, Inc., A Pennsylvania Corporation, Operating as Woodlands, An
Inn.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued: December 8, 1988.
Decided: December 15, 1988.
Appeal No. 91 E.D. Appeal Dkt. 1988; from Order of Superior Court,368 Pa. Super. 648, 531 A.2d 39 (1987) enteredPage 79June 12, 1987, at No. 2642 Philadelphia 1986, Affirming Judgment of Court of Common Pleas of Luzerne County, Civil Division, entered September 10, 1986, at No. 740-C of 1983; Arthur E. Dalessandro, Judge.
John H. Kennedy, Kingston, Robert A. Gonos, Wilkes Barre, for appellant.

Patrick E. Dougherty, Joseph J. Heston, Kingston, for S B Restaurant.
Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT, ZAPPALA, PAPADAKOS and STOUT, JJ.
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Order affirmed.

LARSEN, J., dissents.