Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
GIONFRIDDO v. GARTENHAUS CAFE, 209 Conn. 809 (1988)
FRANK P. GIONFRIDDO, Adm’r, Adm’x (ESTATE OF KIM MARIE GIONFRIDDO), ETAL. v. GARTENHAUS CAFE, 548 A.2d 437 (Conn. 1988)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 1988-09-20
- Topic
- general
GIONFRIDDO v. GARTENHAUS CAFE, 209 Conn. 809 (1988) 548 A.2d 437 FRANK P. GIONFRIDDO, ADMINISTRATOR (ESTATE OF KIM MARIE GIONFRIDDO), ETAL. v. GARTENHAUS CAFESupreme Court of Connecticut The plaintiffs' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 15 Conn. App. 392, is granted, limited to the following issue: "Is the plaintiff collaterally estopped from seeking an additional recovery from a defendant by virtue of the plaintiff's judgment against third parties not in privity with the defendant?" Edward F.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed GIONFRIDDO v. GARTENHAUS CAFE, 209 Conn. 809 (1988). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
"Is the plaintiff collaterally estopped from seeking an additional recovery from a defendant by virtue of the plaintiff's judgment against third parties not in privity with the defendant?"
Edward F. Hennessey, in support of the petition.
Henry C. Ide, in opposition.