Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions

PARK CITY HOSPITAL v. C.C.O.H./HEALTH CARE, 208 Conn. 811 (1988)

PARK CITY Hosp. v. Conn. Comm’n ON HOSPITALS ANDHEALTH CARE, 545 A.2d 1107 (Conn. 1988)

Type: Opinion
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Date: 1988-06-22
Topic: general

PARK CITY HOSPITAL v. C.C.O.H./HEALTH CARE, 208 Conn. 811 (1988) 545 A.2d 1107 PARK CITY HOSPITAL v. CONNECTICUT COMMISSION ON HOSPITALS ANDHEALTH CARE ET AL.Supreme Court of Connecticut The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 14 Conn. App. 413, is granted, limited to the issue: "Did the Appellate Court err in affirming the trial court's suo motu dismissal of the plaintiff's appeal for lack of aggrievement as an incident to the plaintiff's application for a stay of execution?" Sigmund L. Miller, in support of the petition.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PARK CITY HOSPITAL v. C.C.O.H./HEALTH CARE, 208 Conn. 811 (1988). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PARK CITY HOSPITAL v. C.C.O.H./HEALTH CARE,208 Conn. 811(1988)

545 A.2d 1107

PARK CITY HOSPITALv.CONNECTICUT COMMISSION ON HOSPITALS AND

HEALTH CARE ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court,14 Conn. App. 413, is granted, limited to the issue: "Did the Appellate Court err in affirming the trial court's suo motu dismissal of the plaintiff's appeal for lack of aggrievement as an incident to the plaintiff's application for a stay of execution?"

Sigmund L. Miller, in support of the petition.

Paul J. Lahey, assistant attorney general, and Arnold Sbarge, in opposition.

Decided June 22, 1988