Opinion · New Jersey Superior Court

Philadelphia v. Stadler

Phila. v. Stadler, 173 N.J. Super. 235 (New Jersey Superior Court 1980)

Type
Opinion
Court
New Jersey Superior Court
Jurisdiction
New Jersey
Date
1980-04-18
Topic
general

173 N.J. Super. 235 (1980) 413 A.2d 996 CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. HENRY H. STADLER, SALVATORE DIMARTINO, JOSEPH A. SULPIZIE, JAMES SPROULES AND JAMES M.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Philadelphia v. Stadler. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
9 opinions
173 N.J. Super. 235 (1980) 413 A.2d 996

CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
HENRY H. STADLER, SALVATORE DIMARTINO, JOSEPH A. SULPIZIE, JAMES SPROULES AND JAMES M. MCCULLOGH, JR., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued April 1, 1980. Decided April 18, 1980.

Before Judges FRITZ, KOLE and LANE.

William S. Ruggierio argued the cause for appellant (Ruggierio & Freeman, attorneys).

Charles Crabbe Thomas argued the cause for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment essentially for the reasons given in Judge Wells' published opinion. Philadelphia v. Stadler, 164 N.J. Super. 281 (Cty.D.Ct. 1978). See, also, Philadelphia v. Smith, 82 N.J. 429 (1980), aff'g 169 N.J. Super. 156 (App.Div. 1979).

We find no merit to any of the contentions raised on this appeal as grounds for reversal.

Affirmed.