Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey
Devaney v. Sarno
65 N.J. 235
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of New Jersey
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1974-06-10
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- "Under such circumstances, it was for the jury to say whether Devaney, conscious of the risk of driving without a seat belt and the possibility of being involved in an accident, acted unreasonably in driving his car on the day in question."
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Devaney v. Sarno. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 8 opinions
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division, 125 N. J. Super. 414.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Hughes, and Justices Jacobs, Hall, Mountain, Sullivan, Pashman and Clifford — 7.
For reversal — Fone.