Opinion · Njlaw New Jersey

CONTI CAUSEWAY FORD v. JAROSSY, 118 N.J. Super. 521 (1972)

288 A.2d 872

Type: Opinion
Court: Njlaw New Jersey
Jurisdiction: Njlaw
Date: 1972-03-15
Topic: general

CONTI CAUSEWAY FORD v. JAROSSY, 118 N.J. Super. 521 (1972) 288 A.2d 872 CONTI CAUSEWAY FORD, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. NORMA JAROSSY AND STEPHENJAROSSY, DEFENDANTS-THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THE FIRST NATIONALBANK OF TOMS RIVER, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.Argued March 7, 1972 — Decided March 15, 1972.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed CONTI CAUSEWAY FORD v. JAROSSY, 118 N.J. Super. 521 (1972). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

CONTI CAUSEWAY FORD v. JAROSSY,118 N.J. Super. 521(1972)

288 A.2d 872

CONTI CAUSEWAY FORD, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. NORMA JAROSSY AND STEPHEN

JAROSSY, DEFENDANTS-THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THE FIRST NATIONAL

BANK OF TOMS RIVER, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued March 7, 1972 —

Decided March 15, 1972.

On appeal from Ocean County District Court.

Reported at114 N.J. Super. 382(Cty. D. Ct. 1971)

Mr. Denis J. Corbett,Staff Attorney, Ocean County Legal Services, Inc., argued the cause for appellants Norma Jarossy and Stephen Jarossy.Page 522Mr. Robert S. Fisher,argued the cause for respondent The First National Bank of Toms River.Mr. Eugene Jume,filed statement in lieu of brief for respondent Conti Causeway Ford.

Before Judges LEWIS, HALPERN and LORA.

PER CURIAM.

We have considered the issues raised by appellants in the light of the circumstances of this case, and conclude the judgment should be affirmed for the reasons expressed in Judge Robert H. Doherty, Jr.'s opinion below.Page 523