Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey
Lanning v. Hudson County Court of Common Pleas
127 N.J.L. 604
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of New Jersey
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1942-01-09
- Topic
- general
*605 Per Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Perskie in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Case, Donges, Heher, Colie, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 13. For reversal — None.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Lanning v. Hudson County Court of Common Pleas. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Perskie in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Case, Donges, Heher, Colie, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.