Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey
Schults v. BD. OF EDUC. OF TOWNSHIP OF TEANECK
45 N.J. 2
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of New Jersey
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1965-06-01
- Topic
- general
*3 Per Curiam. We agree with the Appellate Division’s determination (86 N. J. Super. 29 (1964)) that the plaintiffs should first have exhausted their administrative remedies before the Commissioner and State Board of Education. The dismissal of their complaint is: Affirmed.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Schults v. BD. OF EDUC. OF TOWNSHIP OF TEANECK. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 9 opinions
*3 Per Curiam.
We agree with the Appellate Division’s determination (86 N. J. Super. 29 (1964)) that the plaintiffs should first have exhausted their administrative remedies before the Commissioner and State Board of Education. The dismissal of their complaint is:
Affirmed.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Hall, Schettino and Haneman — 6. For reversal — None.