Opinion · Njlaw New Jersey

ROYAK v. RYNAR, 40 N.J. 216 (1963)

IRVING ROYAK, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. GEORGE RYNAR T/A G. L.DELICATESSEN, RESPONDENT-PETITIONER., 191 A.2d 59 (N.J. 1963)

Type: Opinion
Court: Njlaw New Jersey
Jurisdiction: Njlaw
Date: 1963-04-01
Topic: general

ROYAK v. RYNAR, 40 N.J. 216 (1963) 191 A.2d 59 IRVING ROYAK, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. GEORGE RYNAR T/A G. L.DELICATESSEN, RESPONDENT-PETITIONER.Supreme Court of New Jersey. April 1, 1963.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed ROYAK v. RYNAR, 40 N.J. 216 (1963). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

ROYAK v. RYNAR,40 N.J. 216(1963)

191 A.2d 59

IRVING ROYAK, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. GEORGE RYNAR T/A G. L.

DELICATESSEN, RESPONDENT-PETITIONER.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

April 1, 1963.

On petition for certification to Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Messrs. Gurry and Conlanfor the petitioner.Messrs. Balk and Jacobsfor the respondent.

Denied.