Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey

Katz v. New York Life Insurance

126 N.J.L. 370

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction
New Jersey
Date
1941-04-25
Topic
general

Per Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bodine in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Parker, Case, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Colie, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 14. For reversal — None.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Katz v. New York Life Insurance. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions
Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bodine in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Parker, Case, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Colie, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.