Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey
El v. Toohey
El v. Toohey, 125 N.J.L. 510 (N.J. 1941)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of New Jersey
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1941-01-03
- Topic
- general
Per Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Case in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Bodine, Perskie, Porter, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 10. For reversal — None.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed El v. Toohey. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 5 opinions
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Case in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Bodine, Perskie, Porter, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.