Opinion · Njlaw New Jersey

SCHULT v. H. C. REALTY CORPORATION, 29 N.J. 279 (1959)

MARY SCHULT ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-PETITIONERS, v. H. C. REALTY CORPORATION,DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT., 148 A.2d 894 (N.J. 1959)

Type
Opinion
Court
Njlaw New Jersey
Jurisdiction
Njlaw
Date
1959-03-09
Topic
general

SCHULT v. H. C. REALTY CORPORATION, 29 N.J. 279 (1959) 148 A.2d 894 MARY SCHULT ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-PETITIONERS, v. H.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed SCHULT v. H. C. REALTY CORPORATION, 29 N.J. 279 (1959). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

SCHULT v. H. C. REALTY CORPORATION,29 N.J. 279(1959)
148 A.2d 894
MARY SCHULTET AL.,PLAINTIFFS-PETITIONERS, v. H. C. REALTY CORPORATION,
DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
March 9, 1959.
Appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.
Mr. Henry ShiffmanandMessrs. Baker, Garber Chazenfor the petitioner.Mr. Raymond L. CunneenandMr. Hugh J. O'Gormanfor the respondent.
Denied.Page 280