Opinion · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Pines Plaza Bowling, Inc. v. Rossview, Inc.

394 Pa. 124

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction
Pennsylvania
Date
1958-11-10
Topic
litigation

How later courts describe this case

  • discussing the various circumstances that the Commonwealth’s courts use may determine intent
  • In construing a contract, the agreement must be interpreted as a whole, and the words given their ordinary meaning
  • “[I]f the terms of a contract are ambiguous, any doubt or ambiguity must be construed against the party who wrote it and the true meaning decided by the jury and not the court.” (citation omitted)
  • where undefined, words of a contract are given their ordinary meaning
  • using dictionary definition to ascertain plain meaning of contract language
  • contract to lease shopping center space
  • only ambiguous contracts are interpreted against drafter

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Pines Plaza Bowling, Inc. v. Rossview, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
66 opinions
394 Pa. 124 (1958)

Pines Plaza Bowling, Inc., Appellant,
v.
Rossview, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued October 2, 1958. November 10, 1958.

*125 Before JONES, C.J., BELL, MUSMANNO, JONES and COHEN, JJ.

*126 Aaron Rosenzweig, with him Samuel M. Rosenzweig, for appellant.

David R. Levin, for appellee.

OPINION PER CURIAM, November 10, 1958:

Judgment affirmed on the able opinion of Judge LORAN LEWIS, 14 Pa. D. & C. 2d 459.