Opinion · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Pines Plaza Bowling, Inc. v. Rossview, Inc.
394 Pa. 124
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- Jurisdiction
- Pennsylvania
- Date
- 1958-11-10
- Topic
- litigation
How later courts describe this case
- discussing the various circumstances that the Commonwealth’s courts use may determine intent
- In construing a contract, the agreement must be interpreted as a whole, and the words given their ordinary meaning
- “[I]f the terms of a contract are ambiguous, any doubt or ambiguity must be construed against the party who wrote it and the true meaning decided by the jury and not the court.” (citation omitted)
- where undefined, words of a contract are given their ordinary meaning
- using dictionary definition to ascertain plain meaning of contract language
- contract to lease shopping center space
- only ambiguous contracts are interpreted against drafter
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Pines Plaza Bowling, Inc. v. Rossview, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 66 opinions
394 Pa. 124 (1958)
Pines Plaza Bowling, Inc., Appellant,
Pines Plaza Bowling, Inc., Appellant,
v.
Rossview, Inc.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued October 2, 1958. November 10, 1958.*125 Before JONES, C.J., BELL, MUSMANNO, JONES and COHEN, JJ.
*126 Aaron Rosenzweig, with him Samuel M. Rosenzweig, for appellant.
David R. Levin, for appellee.
OPINION PER CURIAM, November 10, 1958:
Judgment affirmed on the able opinion of Judge LORAN LEWIS, 14 Pa. D. & C. 2d 459.