Opinion · Njlaw New Jersey

DAVIDSON v. FORNICOLA, 20 N.J. 467 (1956)

ADDISON DAVIDSON, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. MICHAEL FORNICOLA,ET AL., DEFENDANTS-PETITIONERS., 120 A.2d 275 (N.J. 1956)

Type: Opinion
Court: Njlaw New Jersey
Jurisdiction: Njlaw
Date: 1956-02-06
Topic: general

DAVIDSON v. FORNICOLA, 20 N.J. 467 (1956) 120 A.2d 275 ADDISON DAVIDSON, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. MICHAEL FORNICOLA,ET AL., DEFENDANTS-PETITIONERS.Supreme Court of New Jersey. February 6, 1956. Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed DAVIDSON v. FORNICOLA, 20 N.J. 467 (1956). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

DAVIDSON v. FORNICOLA,20 N.J. 467(1956)

120 A.2d 275

ADDISON DAVIDSON,ET AL.,PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. MICHAEL FORNICOLA,

ET AL.,DEFENDANTS-PETITIONERS.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

February 6, 1956.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Messrs. Durand, Ivins Cartonfor the petitioners.Messrs. Parsons, Labrecque, Canzona Combsfor the respondent.

Denied.Page 468