Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey
Larkin v. Wikoff
77 N.J. Eq. 589
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of New Jersey
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1910-11-14
- Topic
- general
Per Curiam. So much of the decree as is involved in this appeal will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed by Vice-Chancellor Walker in the court below. For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parke?, Bergen, Voori-iees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Dill, Congdon — 13. For reversal — None.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Larkin v. Wikoff. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 10 opinions
So much of the decree as is involved in this appeal will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed by Vice-Chancellor Walker in the court below.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parke?, Bergen, Voori-iees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Dill, Congdon — 13.
For reversal — None.