Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey
Miller v. Miller
21 Dickinson 436
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of New Jersey
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1904-05-13
- Topic
- general
Per Curiam. The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated ini the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Reed in the court below. For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Dixon, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgh — 8. For reversal — Fort, Vroom, Green, Gray — 4.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Miller v. Miller. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 11 opinions
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated ini the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Reed in the court below.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Dixon, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgh — 8.
For reversal — Fort, Vroom, Green, Gray — 4.