Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey

Barrett v. Bloomfield Savings Institution

Barrett v. Bloomfield Sav. Inst., 66 N.J. Eq. 431 (N.J. 1904)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction
New Jersey
Date
1904-02-29
Topic
general

Per Curiam. The order appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Pitney filed in • the court of chancery. For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Dixon, Garrison, Fort, Hendrickson, Pitney,.Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray — -12. For reversal — Hone.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Barrett v. Bloomfield Savings Institution. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion
Per Curiam.

The order appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Pitney filed in • the court of chancery.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Dixon, Garrison, Fort, Hendrickson, Pitney,.Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray — -12.

For reversal — Hone.