Opinion · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

McKown's Estate

McKown's Est., 198 PA 96 (Pa. 1901)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction
Pennsylvania
Date
1901-01-07
Topic
estate-planning

Per Curiam, We are not convinced of error in any of the assignments filed on this appeal. All the questions raised by them were thoroughly discussed and carefully considered by counsel and court previous to the appeal, and the conclusion arrived at was against the appellant’s contention. In the opinion of the court on exceptions the principal matter passed upon was the appellant’s claim to the policy issued in 1888. The claim was rejected and held to be in fraud of the creditors. In this we discover no error, and in connection with it we may add that we find nothing in the decree appealed from which requires a reversal or modification.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed McKown's Estate. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
9 opinions
Per Curiam,

We are not convinced of error in any of the assignments filed on this appeal. All the questions raised by them were thoroughly discussed and carefully considered by counsel and court previous to the appeal, and the conclusion arrived at was against the appellant’s contention. In the opinion of the court on exceptions the principal matter passed upon was the appellant’s claim to the policy issued in 1888. The claim was rejected and held to be in fraud of the creditors. In this we discover no error, and in connection with it we may add that we find nothing in the decree appealed from which requires a reversal or modification.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at the cost of the appellant.