Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey
Holt v. State
29 Vroom 11
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of New Jersey
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1895-06-15
- Topic
- bankruptcy
Per Curiam. This judgment cannot be sustained. The record before the court exhibits all the errors that, more than forty years ago, led to the reversal of a judgment in the case of Cruser v. State, 3 Harr. 209. The defects that vitiated the proceedings in that case, as indicated in the opinion, were that the indictment in question did not appear, from the caption, to have been one of the bills that had been found by the grand inquest; that the record did not show that the indictment was ordered by the Oyer and Terminer in which it was pending to be delivered to the Quarter Sessions; or that it was filed in that court as the statute directs; or that there was a Court of Quarter Sessions then and there held ; or how many judges composed the court before which the trial took place.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Holt v. State. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 20 opinions
This judgment cannot be sustained. The record before the court exhibits all the errors that, more than forty years ago, led to the reversal of a judgment in the case of Cruser v. State, 3 Harr. 209.
The defects that vitiated the proceedings in that case, as indicated in the opinion, were that the indictment in question did not appear, from the caption, to have been one of the bills that had been found by the grand inquest; that the record did not show that the indictment was ordered by the Oyer and Terminer in which it was pending to be delivered to the Quarter Sessions; or that it was filed in that court as the statute directs; or that there was a Court of Quarter Sessions then and there held ; or how many judges composed the court before which the trial took place.
Every one of these defects exists in the present instance.
Let the judgment be reversed.