Opinion · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Kinsel's Appeal
314 Pa. 365
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- Jurisdiction
- Pennsylvania
- Date
- 1934-04-09
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- court recognized the “sole actor” exception, but found it unnecessary to apply it
- "The rule that knowledge or notice on the part of the agent is to be treated as notice to the principal is founded on the duty of the agent to communicate all material information to his principal and the presumption that he has done so.”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Kinsel's Appeal. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 10 opinions
Opinion by
Me. Justice Simpson,And now, April 9, 1934, in accordance with the agreement of January 10, 1934, filed in this case, it is directed that the order of the court below be and the same is hereby reversed, and the petition to dismiss appellant from his office as a school director be and the same is hereby dismissed, but without costs to either party.