Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey
Sodowich v. Heimert
109 N.J.L. 265
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of New Jersey
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1932-05-16
- Topic
- general
Per Curiam. The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Trenchaed, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Van Buseire, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 11. For reversal — None.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Sodowich v. Heimert. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Trenchaed, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Van Buseire, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.