Opinion · Njlaw New Jersey

SMITH v. BD. FREEHOLDERS, MONMOUTH CO., 104 N.J.L. 185 (1927)

JOHN M. SMITH, RESPONDENT, v. Bd. OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS OF THE COUNTY OFMONMOUTH ET AL., APPELLANTS., 138 A. 923 (Ct. Err. & App. 1927)

Type
Opinion
Court
Njlaw New Jersey
Jurisdiction
Njlaw
Date
1927-10-17
Topic
general

SMITH v. BD. FREEHOLDERS, MONMOUTH CO., 104 N.J.L. 185 (1927) 138 A. 923 JOHN M. SMITH, RESPONDENT, v. BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS OF THE COUNTY OFMONMOUTH ET AL., APPELLANTS.Court of Errors and Appeals.Submitted May 27, 1927 — Decided October 17, 1927.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed SMITH v. BD. FREEHOLDERS, MONMOUTH CO., 104 N.J.L. 185 (1927). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

SMITH v. BD. FREEHOLDERS, MONMOUTH CO.,104 N.J.L. 185(1927)
138 A. 923
JOHN M. SMITH, RESPONDENT, v. BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS OF THE COUNTY OF
MONMOUTH ET AL., APPELLANTS.
Court of Errors and Appeals.
Submitted May 27, 1927 —
Decided October 17, 1927.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whoseper curiamis printed in5 N.J. Mis. R. 153.
For the respondent,Quinn, Parsons Doremus.

For the appellants,William A. Stevens.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.For affirmance— THE CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, KALISCH, KATZENBACH, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 11.For reversal— None.Page 186