Opinion · Njlaw New Jersey

STATE v. FERO, 103 N.J.L. 715 (1927)

STATE OF N.J., DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. JOSEPH FERO, PLAINTIFF INERROR., 137 A. 718 (Ct. Err. & App. 1927)

Type
Opinion
Court
New Jersey
Jurisdiction
New Jersey
Date
1927-03-24
Topic
general

STATE v. FERO, 103 N.J.L. 715 (1927) 137 A. 718 THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. JOSEPH FERO, PLAINTIFF INERROR.Court of Errors and Appeals.Submitted February 11, 1927 — Decided March 24, 1927. On error to the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in4 N.J. Mis.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE v. FERO, 103 N.J.L. 715 (1927). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

STATE v. FERO,103 N.J.L. 715(1927)
137 A. 718
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. JOSEPH FERO, PLAINTIFF IN
ERROR.
Court of Errors and Appeals.
Submitted February 11, 1927 —
Decided March 24, 1927.
On error to the Supreme Court, whoseper curiamis printed in4 N.J. Mis. R. 501.
For the defendant in error,Wilfred H. Jayne, Jr.

For the plaintiff in error,Alexander Simpson.Page 716
PER CURIAM.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion deliveredper curiamin the Supreme Court.For affirmance— THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, KALISCH, BLACK, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 11.For reversal— None.