Opinion · Njlaw New Jersey

SHARKEY v. HERMAN BROTHERS, INCORPORATED, 102 N.J.L. 224 (1925)

JAMES SHARKEY ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. HERMAN Bros., INCORPORATED,APPELLANT., 130 A. 920 (Ct. Err. & App. 1925)

Type: Opinion
Court: Njlaw New Jersey
Jurisdiction: Njlaw
Date: 1925-09-11
Topic: general

SHARKEY v. HERMAN BROTHERS, INCORPORATED, 102 N.J.L. 224 (1925) 130 A. 920 JAMES SHARKEY ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. HERMAN BROTHERS, INCORPORATED,APPELLANT.Court of Errors and Appeals.Submitted May 29, 1925 — Decided September 11, 1925. On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 3 N.J. Mis.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed SHARKEY v. HERMAN BROTHERS, INCORPORATED, 102 N.J.L. 224 (1925). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

SHARKEY v. HERMAN BROTHERS, INCORPORATED,102 N.J.L. 224(1925)

130 A. 920

JAMES SHARKEY ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. HERMAN BROTHERS, INCORPORATED,

APPELLANT.

Court of Errors and Appeals.

Submitted May 29, 1925 —

Decided September 11, 1925.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whoseper curiamis printed in3 N.J. Mis. R. 126.

For the appellant,Frank G. Turner.

For the respondents,Richard Doherty.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.For affirmance— TRENCHARD, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, JJ. 11.For reversal— None.