Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey

Sarno v. Gulf Refining Co.

Sarno v. Gulf Refin. Co., 102 N.J.L. 223 (N.J. 1925)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction
New Jersey
Date
1925-09-09
Topic
general

Per Curiam. The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice' Minturn in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — Trenchard, Kalisch, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 10. For reversal — None.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Sarno v. Gulf Refining Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
10 opinions
Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice' Minturn in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Trenchard, Kalisch, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.